The act of reading was already two ways.
read The act may actually have already been two ways, just not clearly distinguished. 精炼" or "議諔" or "視覴" or "視覴" or "視覴" or "視覴" or "精炼 There are people who can read on without worrying too much about these things, and there are people who get very curious and get stuck there.
I'm the one who doesn't mind reading on...
I interpret this to be something like "refining."
It's probably a language mix with Chinese, not a byte mix like "視覴" Is there 100% understanding of the words first and then the sentences, or is it possible to move on to sentence comprehension without 100% understanding of the words?
Even if it's not limited to AI output, there have been misprints, etc.
Don't pay so much attention to individual words unless they are used repeatedly.
If it's important, it's customarily enclosed in swastikas or bolded, so don't worry about the details of words that aren't.
Some people read aloud in their minds and some don't.
People who read aloud slow down when there are words they can't pronounce.
Something like that.
Some people have a problem with even a few words they don't understand the meaning of, and others have no problem with a few.
There is a gap in the definition of reading.
Can we control the threshold?
Can you handle being aware of what you don't know?
Reading to make sure there's nothing you don't know properly seems to be a training in the math department.
I don't know if you're aware that you're not doing that in your everyday writing.
The word "right" is undefined, which makes it impossible to read.
Can you put something you don't understand on hold and read on?
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/読む行為はすでに二通りあった using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.